닐스 로고

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Here's a bit of historical past from one other America: the Bill of Rights was designed to guard the people from their authorities. If the first Amendment's right to talk out publicly was the folks's wall of security, then the Fourth Amendment's right to privacy was its buttress. It was as soon as thought that the government should neither be capable to cease citizens from speaking nor peer into their lives. Consider that as the essence of the Constitutional period that ended when those towers came down on September 11, 2001. Consider how privacy labored earlier than 9/eleven and the way it really works now in Post-Constitutional America. In Post-Constitutional America, the federal government might as properly have taken scissors to the original copy of the Constitution saved within the National Archives, then crumpled up the Fourth Amendment and tossed it in the rubbish can. The NSA revelations of Edward Snowden are, in that sense, U88 not only a shock to the conscience but to the Fourth Amendment itself: our authorities spies on us.

All of us. Without suspicion. Without warrants. Without probable trigger. Without restraint. This may qualify as "unreasonable" in our previous constitutional world, however no extra. Here, then, are four ways in which, within the name of American "safety" and in accordance with our authorities, the Fourth Amendment no longer actually applies to our lives. Begin at America's borders. Most people believe they are "in" the United States as soon as they step off a world flight and are thus absolutely lined by the Bill of Rights. The reality has, within the twenty-first century, turn into infinitely extra difficult as lengthy-standing practices are manipulated to serve the expanding needs of the national safety state. The mining of words and concepts for new, darker meanings is a hallmark of how issues work in Post-Constitutional America. Over the years, recognizing that certain situations might render Fourth Amendment requirements impractical or in opposition to the general public curiosity, the Supreme Court crafted varied exceptions to them. One was the "border search." The idea was that the United States needs to be ready to guard itself by stopping and analyzing people entering the country.

As a result, routine border searches without warrants are constitutionally "cheap" just by advantage of where they take place. Here's the twist in the present period: the definition of "border" has been changed. Upon arriving within the United States from abroad, you aren't legally present within the country till allowed to enter by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials. You recognize, the guys who look into your luggage and stamp your passport. Until that moment, you exist in a legal void the place the protections of the Bill of Rights and the legal guidelines of the United States do not apply. This idea additionally predates Post-Constitutional America and the DHS. Remember the sorting process at Ellis Island in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? No lawyers allowed there. Those modest exceptions had been all part of constitutional America. Today, as soon as cheap searches at the border have morphed into a vast "Constitution-free zone." The "border" is now a strip of land circling the nation and extending 100 miles inland that includes two-thirds of the U.S.

On this vast area, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) can set up checkpoints and conduct warrantless searches. At airports, American residents are now similarly subjected to go looking and seizure as filmmaker Laura Poitras -- whose work focuses on nationwide security points generally and Edward Snowden in the actual -- is aware of firsthand. Since 2006, almost each time Poitras has returned to the U.S., her plane has been met by government brokers and her laptop computer and phone examined. There are multiple similar high-profile cases (including these of a Wikileaks researcher and a Chelsea Manning supporter), but odd citizens are hardly exempt. Despite standing in an American airport, a pane of glass away from cherished ones, you aren't within the U.S. Fourth Amendment rights. How many such airport searches are performed within the aggregate is unknown. The best information we now have comes from a FOIA request by the ACLU. It revealed that, in the 18-month interval beginning in October 2008, greater than 6,600 individuals, about half of them U.S.